Journal CME January - High versus low intensity: What is the optimal approach to prospective audit and feedback in an antimicrobial stewardship program?

ARTICLE:

High versus low intensity: What is the optimal approach to prospective audit and feedback in an antimicrobial stewardship program?

OBJECTIVE:

We examined the impact of a high–intensity interdisciplinary rounds–based PAF compared to low–intensity PAF on antimicrobial use on internal medicine wards in a 400–bed community hospital.

INSTRUCTIONS:

  1. Read the article with the PDF provided
  2. Take the quiz until you score a passing rate of 80%
  3. Fill out the Program Evaluation
  4. Resources includes an Interview with the Author from the ICHE Podcast
  5. Earn your CME and print your certificate

Course summary

Available credit: 
  • 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™
Course opens: 
01/06/2020
Course expires: 
12/31/2020
Member cost:
$0.00
Cost:
$20.00
Part of: 
Journal CME 2020

Available Credit

  • 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™

Price

Member cost:
$0.00
Cost:
$20.00
Please login or register to take this course.